IEffectiveness of Implementing an Internal Quality Assurance System in Private Universities (Case Study of Mandiri Bina Prestasi University)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58918/lofian.v4i2.286Keywords:
Pengukuran, Efektivitas, Penjaminan Mutu, Perguruan Tinggi, UniversitasAbstract
Based on Minister of Education and Culture Regulation No. 53 of 2023, universities as educational institutions have a big responsibility to provide quality educational services through the Internal Quality Assurance System (SPMI). It is hoped that the presence of SPMI can make a positive contribution to the quality of education in a tertiary institution. SPMI can be called the foundation of higher education which must be implemented by ensuring that every element in the environment moves according to higher education standards. The implementation of SPMI has indeed become a benchmark for determining the quality of a tertiary institution, but there are still many who have not implemented it according to the standards that have been set, resulting in the level of effectiveness of implementing SPMI in tertiary institutions being low. The private university Mandiri Bina Prestasi University (UMBP) has complete SPMI documents and refers to Minister of Education and Culture Regulation No. 53 of 2023 and measures the level of effectiveness of SPMI implementation through SPMI implementation effectiveness indicators by conducting Internal Quality Audits (AMI) and Monitoring and Evaluation (Monev) on the performance and quality of each work unit within the UMBP environment including all Study Programs. In this way, by filling out questionnaires and questionnaires which are distributed to all elements and work units, the level of effectiveness of the implementation of SPMI at UMBP Higher Education can be measured, making it easier for decision makers and policy makers to improve and even increase the standards that apply at UMBP so that Good University Government can be achieved.Downloads
References
Kemenristekdikti. Permenristekdiktik No. 44 Th. 2015.; 2015:1-58.
Anggito, Albi dan Johan Setiawan. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Cet. I.Bandung: CV Jejak. 2018
Peraturan Presiden RI. PP RI No 4 Th. 2014 Ttg Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Tinggi Dan Pengelolaan Perguruan Tinggi.; 2014:1-37.
Kemenristekdikti Ditjen Belmawa Direktorat Penjaminan Mutu. Bahan Pelatihan Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta; 2016..
Sitanggang, E. D., Sembiring, M., Pinem, A., & Pasaribu, M. (2022). Analysis of Elearning Quality Measurement with Webqual method using Artificial Neural Networks. INFOKUM, 10(02), 781-791. Retrieved from http://seaninstitute.org/infor/index.php/infokum/article/view/413
AUN-QA. Guide to Aun-Qa Assessment at Programme Level Version 3.0.; 2015..
Lailina, Asnaul. “Implementasi Penjaminan Mutu Internal (SPMI) di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK),” Jurnal Akuntabilitas Pendidikan Volume 8, No. 2, September 2020 (196-204). http://journal.uny.ac.id/indeks.php/jamp. 2021.…
Kementerian Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi. Permenristekdikti No 32 Thn. 2016 Ttg Akreditasi Prodi Dan PT.; 2016:1-32.
Kemenristekdikti. Permenristekdiktik No. 44 Th. 2015.; 2015:1-58
Kebijakan Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal Universitas Mandiri Bina Prestasi ; 2022
Permenristekdikti No 62 Tahun 2016. Tentang Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Tinggi.”
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sartana, Fauzi Haris Simbolon, Ratna Wati Simbolon, Maradu Sihombing, Marice Hotnauli Simbolon

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


